Validating a variable length list, ASP.NET MVC 2-style
MVC, UI, Validation January 28th, 2010In the previous post I showed a fairly straightforward way to create an editor where the user can add and delete the items in a set. Please read that previous post before continuing to read this one.
![]()
But what about validation? We don’t like your blank item names or your negative prices, sonny!
As you probably know, ASP.NET MVC 2 supports DataAnnotations attributes out of the box, so you can mark up your model as follows.
public class Gift { [Required] public string Name { get; set; } [Range(0.01, double.MaxValue, ErrorMessage = "Please enter a price above zero.")] public double Price { get; set; } }
Server-side validation
Server-side validation is trivial, assuming you want to use the default model binder convention of validating each model object when it’s bound. In the action that receives the form post, just check ModelState.IsValid, and refuse to accept the data if it isn’t.
[HttpPost] public ActionResult Index(IEnumerable<Gift> gifts) { if (ModelState.IsValid) return View("Completed", gifts); else return View(gifts); // Redisplay the form with errors }
You’ll also need to specify where the validation error messages should appear. Update the GiftEditorRow.ascx partial by placing a couple of Html.ValidationMessageFor() helpers somewhere inside the row.
<%= Html.ValidationMessageFor(x => x.Name) %> <%= Html.ValidationMessageFor(x => x.Price) %>
Now, if the incoming data doesn’t satisfy your rules, the form will be re-rendered, displaying appropriate messages.
![]()
Client-side validation
It gets a bit more complicated if you also want client-side validation. You could use xVal (I’m not sure whether it would be easier or harder), but I want to get better acquainted with ASP.NET MVC 2’s built-in client-side validation feature, so I’m going to use that.
I don’t even know if there’s an officially recommended way of doing ASP.NET MVC 2 client-side validation when you’re dynamically adding and removing form elements, but I’ll show you a technique I found that will do it. Be warned: this is rather hacky. I’d be interested to hear if anyone can suggest a better way.
First, let’s set up client-side validation in the normal way. Enable client-side validation on your form by calling Html.EnableClientValidation():
<h2>Gift List</h2>
What do you want for your birthday?
<% Html.EnableClientValidation(); %>
<% using(Html.BeginForm()) { %>
(rest as before)
<% } %>Now, as long as you’ve already referenced MicrosoftAjax.js and MicrosoftMvcValidation.js, you can run the app and you’ll immediately get working client-side validation! But hang on a minute… it only works for the elements that are present when the form is first rendered, *not* the elements added when the user clicks “Add another…”.
We need a way to capture the extra validation rules added each time the user adds a new row and somehow attach them to the form. One possible approach is to create a new type of custom view result that registers the validators associated with any partial that is renders, and have it emit some JavaScript to attach those validators to the form.
Here’s a possible implementation. Don’t worry if you don’t understand it.
public class AjaxViewResult : ViewResult { public string UpdateValidationForFormId { get; set; } public AjaxViewResult(string viewName, object model) { ViewName = viewName; ViewData = new ViewDataDictionary { Model = model }; } public override void ExecuteResult(ControllerContext context) { var result = base.FindView(context); var viewContext = new ViewContext(context, result.View, ViewData, TempData, context.HttpContext.Response.Output); BeginCapturingValidation(viewContext); base.ExecuteResult(context); EndCapturingValidation(viewContext); result.ViewEngine.ReleaseView(context, result.View); } private void BeginCapturingValidation(ViewContext viewContext) { if (string.IsNullOrEmpty(UpdateValidationForFormId)) return; viewContext.ClientValidationEnabled = true; viewContext.FormContext = new FormContext { FormId = UpdateValidationForFormId }; } private void EndCapturingValidation(ViewContext viewContext) { if (!viewContext.ClientValidationEnabled) return; viewContext.OutputClientValidation(); viewContext.Writer.WriteLine("<script type=\"text/javascript\">Sys.Mvc.FormContext._Application_Load()</script>"); } }
Now, we can change the BlankEditorRow() action method to render its partial using this custom view result.
public ViewResult BlankEditorRow(string formId) { return new AjaxViewResult("GiftEditorRow", new Gift()) { UpdateValidationForFormId = formId }; }
You’ll notice that BlankEditorRow() now needs to be told which form it should attach the new validators to. You’ll have to update the link to BlankEditorRow to add this information to the query string.
<%= Html.ActionLink("Add another...", "BlankEditorRow", new { ViewContext.FormContext.FormId }, new { id = "addItem" }) %>
Et voila! Each time the user appends a new row, its validators will magically be associated with the form.
The problem with removing fields
If you proceed with this approach, you’ll soon discover a further flaw. Even if the user removes fields from the form, any validators associated with those fields will still be lurking. If a field is displaying a “required” error message, and then the user deletes the containing row, it will become impossible to submit the form because the field is still required, except now there is nowhere to enter any data for it. Whoops!
Again, I don’t know if there’s a recommended way to deal with this, but one possibility is to edit the MicrosoftMvcValidation.debug.js script a little. Let’s update the logic slightly so that, if a validator is associated with fields that no longer exist, the validator should no longer apply.
Find the function called “Sys_Mvc_FieldContext$validate”, and right at the top, add the following:
// [Added] Permanently disable this validator if its associated elements are no longer in the document for (var j = 0; j < this.elements.length; j++) { if (!Sys.Mvc.FormContext._isElementInHierarchy(document.body, this.elements[j])) { this.validations = []; break; } }
Now, assuming you’re referencing the file you just edited (MicrosoftMvcValidation.debug.js, rather than MicrosoftMvcValidation.js), you should get the desired change in behaviour. Deleting a row in the editor now kills its associated validation rules properly, so they don’t rise from the grave and block form submissions like invisible validation zombies.
Summary
Once you’ve got the AjaxViewResult class, it doesn’t take that much work to enable client-side validation on dynamically changing forms. Maybe there’s a better and less hacky way though… Anybody got any suggestions?


January 29th, 2010 at 2:06 pm
Thanks for these past two posts. They are very helpful and practical to those trying to learn. All of your contributions (book, blog, tekpub) are appreciated.
January 31st, 2010 at 1:36 pm
Interesting. Thanks!
February 1st, 2010 at 8:38 am
[…] Validating a variable length list, ASP.NET MVC 2-style - Steve Sanderson follows on from his previous post on lists in ASP.NET MVC with a look at applying validation to such a list using ASP.NET MVC2 techniques […]
February 1st, 2010 at 10:52 pm
Hey Steve, nice book..
Have you tried targeting the client side validation script elsewhere in your views (head) ?
I am currently not happy with the Html.EnableClientValidation() cruft injected into my page.
Cheers
February 2nd, 2010 at 5:59 am
I Have MVC 2 but Demo code wont work Beacause of Writer not exists in ViewContext. I have the same comment on previous post. Is it possible you change the source of MVC and build a new version for yourself ?
So include your demo project with the latest build of MVC you use (may on a required bin folder) or may I miss something.
February 2nd, 2010 at 10:12 am
Hi. Great posts!
I’m trying to use this in my project, but I am having some problems.
I don’t want to use attributes for my validation, because I have a lot of special validation that query the database etc. I have my own validators that take care of all validation. I don’t validate editmodels(I’m mapping editmodels to commands). Could you point me in some direction on how to manually add errors to the modelstate with the correct key(id), so the error-message would be associated with the correct input? For single(only one editmodel) input I simply add a modelerror with the property name as key.
I hope you understand my question
Thanks!
February 2nd, 2010 at 10:41 am
Just reading Brad Wilson’s post on remote validation; would this be an easier solution?
February 3rd, 2010 at 10:11 am
Gary - I’m not sure if Html.EnableClientValidation-style forms provide any neat way of rendering the JavaScript in an arbitrary place. They certainly wouldn’t put it in the head, because the validators haven’t even been defined by the time the head section is rendered. These days most people prefer to put their JavaScript at the bottom of the page (not in the head), which might theoretically be possible but I’m not sure right now how you might do that. But is this just a matter of preference, or does it actually cause a practical problem?
Ali - my demo project works with ASP.NET MVC 2.0 Release Candidate. I haven’t modified System.Web.Mvc.dll at all. Can you try removing your reference to System.Web.Mvc.dll, and re-adding the reference to \Program Files\Microsoft ASP.NET\ASP.NET MVC 2\Assemblies\System.Web.Mvc.dll (or wherever the MVC 2 DLL is on your PC)?
Magne - In your action method, use a line of code similar to ModelState.AddModelError(key, errorMessage);. The key value must match the fully-qualified property name (e.g., “gifts[someid].Name”). You can reference a property on a nested model object with a key such as “modelname.propertyname.subpropertyname.subsubpropertyname”.
Jon, I don’t see how remote validation would make this any easier. The challenge is associating the validators for dynamically-added elements with the form. I think the same challenge would apply even if you’re using remote validation.
February 3rd, 2010 at 1:27 pm
Thanks Steve it worked. I Had MVC 2 Beta . When updated to RC Error gone.
Thanks again for great post.
February 3rd, 2010 at 10:54 pm
skip client side validation through asp.net mvc altogether and just implement your own client side validation. If it’s too hacky, better, to write clean code despite duplicating effort.
February 7th, 2010 at 8:17 am
In JQuery there is a live function that allow you to bind into future form. I would imagine something like that would be a good fit for this case.
February 12th, 2010 at 11:49 am
Hi Steve, I’m having difficulty using attributes to ensure datetime fields are valid. I’ve read that the [Range ] attribute can be used to do the job, but I’ve not had any success with that. Because it is the ‘release date’ for a page, I need to have both the date and the time in dd/mm/yy hh:mm format validated.
Do I have to build something myself for this, or is there an existing solution in MVC2?
Thanks
March 2nd, 2010 at 6:02 pm
Excellent work. Validation for dynamically loaded content, what I was looking for a long time. Thank you very much!